Revlon: High-Quality Co.Trading for Big Discount to Peers

By: SumZero Staff | Published: October 29, 2012 | Read Comments (1)

Revlon, Inc.

What we like about a unique, well-known, enduring brand like Revlon in the beauty-products business is the steadiness of demand, high profit margins (EBITDA margin @ 20%), and the resulting predictability of free cash flow over time.

Revlon's business proved to be highly recession resistant during “The Great Recession,” when consumer spending retreated sharply worldwide, company sales dropped about 5% from 2007 to 2009, but EBITDA and free cash flow actually rose.

On top of that intrinsic business stability is a company that has been transformed over the past three years since Alan Ennis took over as CEO. He had been the CFO, but was promoted in 2009 to navigate the company through the financial crisis and put it on more solid operational and financial footing. He’s done just that, paring the product line-up, refinancing debt and significantly cutting costs, to the point where Revlon’s EBITDA margin, at just under 20% (up from 16.5% in 2007), is now on par with much larger industry peers such as L’Oreal and Estee Lauder.

Free cash flow, which has been negative until 2008 because the company was burning so much money on interest expense and an unrefined cost structure, should be around $100 million this year, or $1.91 per share, before extraordinary items. In addition to using that FCF to deleverage (net debt + preferred stock = 4.4x est. 2012 EBITDA, vs. 6.4x in 2007), they have also made tuck-in acquisitions of Sinful Colors in 2011, for $39 mil., and Pure Ice in 2012, for $66 mil., both businesses primarily produce nail polish.

Beside the limited float and resulting illiquidity in the shares and lack of analyst coverage (only two sell-side analysts cover the stock), we think the main reason that the market hasn’t more fully recognized Revlon’s recent transformation is the fact that Ronald Perelman, who took the company private in an LBO in 1985, before bringing it public again via an IPO in 1996 at a split-adjusted price of $219.63, still controls 76.3% of the shares.

The quality of the business is high enough and the discount to intrinsic value here is large enough that we’ll accept the illiquidity in the stock and the risk that Perelman might act against our interests at some point in the future.


Public peers like Estee Lauder and L’Oreal currently trade for around 13x EBITDA on a total enterprise-value basis, with market cap. to free cash flow multiples of about 25x on average. Revlon, at today's closing price of $15.10, trades at a TEV/EBITDA multiple of 8x and a mkt. cap./FCF multiple of 7.9x.

Although Revlon's nearly 20% EBITDA margin is similar to its much larger peers, those other companies have achieved much better track records of growth, so Revlon probably does warrant somewhat of a discounted valuation, just not such a gaping disparity as we see it today.

Our estimate of fair value for REV is $26 (72% higher than current price), which is derived by applying a 10x multiple on estimated 2012 EBITDA of $280 million, which equals a $2.8 billion total enterprise value, subtracting $1.18 billion in net debt, $48 mil. in preferred stock, and $217 million in pension liabilities, yielding an equity value of $1.355 billion, divided by 52.35 million shares outstanding, equals $26 per share. That equity value also equates to about 13.6x the $100 million in free cash flow the business should generate in 2012.


  • peter tucker November 06, 2012 edit |

    I agree, but
    Food is great. but what about George Washington's first ironing board???.Man...that is valuable. have you seen his cleaning bill???
    Okay. Time for a change. Need to know that there are international financial professionals who understand dynamics of historical bonds. That being: There are no PPP for these instruments, nobody is going to pay billions, there are no sovereign buyers, the SEC has nothing to do with these bearer bonds that were issued by various countries, for the explicit purpose of restructuring their debt. The Fed has nothing to do with these..nor does EU. They are private(not world market) transactions that are consummated along the lines of auctions for rare paintings, coins, cars etc. The eccentric millionaire, who craves the last candle lit at Last Supper, or the egg carton that Paul Newman used in "Cool Hand Luke", John Huston's beer mug, Katherine Hepburn's corset from her wedding. I need the "polo pony" types with money to burn and eccentric, elaborate, and expensive know...odd balls, who read War and Peace in a day, and retired at age 8. Further and very exciting information forthcoming.Oh yeah..please do not tell me that they are not here. They are hiding

    Sender is NOT a United States Securities Dealer or Broker or U.S. Investment adviser. Sender is a Consultant and makes no warranties or representations as to the Buyer, Seller or Transaction. All due diligence is the responsibility of the Buyer . This E-mail letter and the attached related documents are never to be considered a solicitation for any purpose in any form or content. Upon receipt of these documents, the recipient hereby acknowledges this Disclaimer. If acknowledgment is not accepted, Recipient must return any and all documents in their original receipted condition to Sender.

    Peter Tucker

Please sign in or create an account on SumZero to post a comment.


Want access to more professional investment research? Join SumZero.